The performance of nationalism: India, Pakistan, and the memory of partition Menon, Jisha
Material type: TextSeries: Cambridge Studies in Modern TheatrePublication details: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2013Description: xii, 260 pISBN:- 9781107051867
- Indic drama - 20th century - History and criticism
- Nationalism in literature
- Partition, Territorial, in literature
- Motion pictures, Indic
- Nationalism in motion pictures
- Drama - English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh
- India - History - Partition, 1947 - Influence
- India - In literature
- Pakistan - In literature
- India - In motion pictures
- Pakistan - In motion pictures
- 891.1 M3P3
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | Ahmedabad | Non-fiction | 891.1 M3P3 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 180927 |
Browsing Ahmedabad shelves, Collection: Non-fiction Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
891.1 M2-I Masterpieces of Indian literature - 3 Vols. | 891.1 M2-II Masterpieces of Indian literature - 3 Vols. | 891.1 M2-III Masterpieces of Indian literature - 3 Vols. | 891.1 M3P3 The performance of nationalism: India, Pakistan, and the memory of partition | 891.1 S4L4 Literature, culture and history in Mughal North India 1550-1800 | 891.1 S7-I-III Stories about the partition of India - 4 Vols. | 891.1 S7-VI Stories about the partition of India - 4 Vols. |
Imagine the patriotic camaraderie of national day parades. How crucial is performance for the sustenance of the nation? The Performance of Nationalism considers the formation of the Indian and Pakistani nation, in the wake of the most violent chapter of its history: the partition of the subcontinent. In the process, Jisha Menon offers a fresh analysis of nationalism from the perspective of performance. Menon recuperates the manifold valences of 'mimesis' as aesthetic representation, as the constitution of a community of witnesses, and as the mimetic relationality that underlies the encounter between India and Pakistan. The particular performances considered here range from Wagah border ceremonies, to the partition theatre of Asghar Wajahat, Kirti Jain, M. K. Raina, and the cinema of Ritwik Ghatak and M. S. Sathyu. By pointing to the tropes of twins, doubles, and doppelgangers that suffuse these performances, this study troubles the idea of two insular, autonomous nation-states of India and Pakistan. In the process, Menon recovers mimetic modes of thinking that unsettle the reified categories of identity politics.
There are no comments on this title.