Rethinking informed consent in bioethics / Neil C Manson and Onora O'Neill
Material type:
- 0521697476
- 174.28 MAN
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Calcutta | 174.28 MAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | IIMC-120839 |
Browsing Calcutta shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
174.2 PAV Crisis and opportunity in the professions / | 174.201 KIN Bioethics, public moral argument, and social responsibility / | 174.28 KAT Experimentation with human beings : | 174.28 MAN Rethinking informed consent in bioethics / | 174.28 TOM Human experimentation and research / | 174.295538 WUJ Well-mannered medicine : | 174.295895 EVA Playing God? : |
Informed consent is a central topic in contemporary biomedical ethics. Yet attempts to set defensible and feasible standards for consenting have led to persistent difficulties. In Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill set debates about informed consent in medicine and research in a fresh light. They show why informed consent cannot be fully specific or fully explicit, and why more specific consent is not always ethically better. They argue that consent needs distinctive communicative transactions, by which other obligations, prohibitions, and rights can be waived or set aside in controlled and specific ways. Their book offers a coherent, wide-ranging and practical account of the role of consent in biomedicine which will be valuable to readers working in a range of areas in bioethics, medicine and law.
There are no comments on this title.